Category Archives: Tech Speak

Making Sense of Aspect Ratios

The programs we license go back as early as the 1960s, so there are a lot of technical difficulties to overcome.  One thing that comes up a lot, and I often see being mishandled, is how to properly display a program.

The old standard was 4:3 (“four-by-three”).  A television with this aspect ratio is nearly square, being 4 units wide and 3 units tall.  About 10 years ago there was a shift to widescreen televisions, or 16:9, where the picture is 16 units wide and 9 units tall.  These can both be shortened to 1.33:1 and 1.77:1 respectively, but using whole numbers is easier and widely accepted.  Many of our programs were made well before the advent widescreen television.  It’s important that we preserve the original aspect ratio when creating DVDs.  This often means using letterboxing and pillarboxing.

You’ve almost certainly seen letterboxing on a 4:3 television.  When a program is shot in a widescreen aspect ratio (1.85:1 and 2.40:1 are common for films, while 16:9 now the norm for television) black bars must be added to the top and bottom of the screen on a 4:3 television to preserve this aspect ratio.  Fun fact: it’s called letterboxing because the image resembles the wide rectangular letter box through which mail can be delivered.  Similarly, pillarboxing is when black bars appear on either side of the screen, which is necessary to properly display a 4:3 image on a 16:9 television.  Many of the DVDs we release will appear pillarboxed on your 16:9 television because they were created before widescreen television became common.  Fun Fact #2: the name comes from the pillar box-style mailboxes used in the UK.

These days the term “full screen” is a bit of a misnomer.  It used to be that everyone had 4:3 television sets, so any program created or edited to fill a 4:3 screen would be dubbed “full screen” because it would fill the screen.  Now most people use a 16:9 set as their primary television and any DVD purporting to be “full screen” will only fill about half!  It’s one of these terms that we keep around because of its past association with the 4:3 aspect ratio and most people who read the spec lines of a DVD will understand what it means.  We always use the term “4:3 full screen” just to be as clear as possible.

HDTVs often give you the option of stretching the picture, but just because an image can fill your screen don’t mean it should.  All this does is distort the picture, resulting in a softer image and the impression that everyone in the program has put on about 30 pounds.  Think of the programs as pieces of art, you wouldn’t want an artist to just fill in extra space to fit a particular frame; you’d want her to create a piece to match her vision and then frame it accordingly.  The black bars on your TV screen are that frame, allowing you to see the film or program as the director wants you to see it.

My recommendation is to simply trust that the discs you watch were created in a way that will present the best possible image.  Never use the zoom button to watch a program and, most importantly, make sure that the set-up menus on your DVD player and television match what you actually have in your living room.

Nick is a DVD developer at Acorn Media. When not obsessing over bitrates and audio streams he enjoys quality time with his wife, cats, and PS3. One of his life goals is to win a World Series of Poker bracelet.

SDH Subtitles vs. Captioning

What does SDH subtitles mean and why do we provide them instead of Closed Captions?

I know Jen explained about captions and subtitles back in March, but I thought I’d elaborate a little on what the acronym SDH means and why we’ve chosen this format for our subtitles. SDH stands for Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard-of-hearing, and they are convey everything that you’d see in closed captioning – dialogue, sound effects (doorbell ringing, dog barking, etc.), lyrics.  Subtitles can be turned on right from a disc menu.  Captions and subtitles are similar, but they are encoded differently.  Captions include both audio and sound effects.  Subtitles don’t always include sound effects (think of seeing a foreign film with subtitles; you can still hear the audio).  This is why we specifically use SDH.

A few years ago we started getting customer calls saying they couldn’t turn on their captions.  At first we thought we had faulty discs on the market or that it must be DVD compatibility issues, but then we used our “little grey cells” and realized that these customers had recently upgraded their A/V set-ups.

HDTV sets and many Blu-Ray and DVD players utilize a type of connection called HDMI which provides better audio and video quality than other connections.  One downside of this is that HDMI does not support the older closed captioning standards.  Someone using an HDMI cable to connect their DVD player to their HDTV will not be able to see closed captions from the disc (unless their DVD player has a built-in decoder).

Since Blu-Ray was developed to be used with HDMI cables, and HDMI does not support the closed captioning standard, we encode our Blu-Ray releases with subtitles.  The SDH subtitles can be accessed right from your player’s menu, without a problem, no matter what sort of connection you have to your TV.  Rather than have one set of discs with closed captions (DVDs) and another with subtitles (Blu-Ray), Acorn has chosen to unify all our titles with the SDH subtitles.

For more information on HDMI and closed captioning click here.

Maybe one day we’ll tell you all about the exciting world of Blu-ray authoring, formats, conversions, etc. We’ve definitely entered a new world of technical challenges.

Christy is Director of Product Development at Acorn. When she’s not in front of the television, she can be found in spin classes at the gym, catching a concert or mastering her new iPad.

To Cut the Cord or Not to Cut the Cord.

There are so many different ways to watch video now. There are the good old-fashioned, reliable cable television and DVDs and movie theaters. But now we also have iTunes, Netflix, cable VOD, Amazon, and even Acorn offers download-to-own options. But instead of cord-cutting (which is how folks have been referring to people who have canceled their cable in favor of TV over the internet) to save money, I’m actually spending more than I ever did before. I have Verizon FIOS with 1000s of channels – just in case I suddenly need to watch the Bollywood Channel or Al-Jazeera or even C-SPAN – with a DVR in two rooms, premium pay channels, and I often use the on-demand services for movies I missed in the theaters. Of course, I still have Netflix, although I’ve cut back to the one disc option. I still buy DVDs, which I sometimes never watch. And I still go to the movie theater (although that’s become an increasingly unpleasant experience) if there’s a movie I really want to see. While I don’t really have tons of time to watch TV, I don’t envision cord cutting because when I do have time then I don’t want to waste it watching anything but exactly what I want in high-definition on my big screen.

BUT I do think a day will come – the Jetsons future we’re all waiting for – when my TV screen acts as a giant computer monitor and I can Google (or Bing or whatever we’re doing then) a show then immediately watch it. Even if we have to pay-per-view, is there any way that it could add up to $150/month like I pay now? I can’t imagine having the kind of time to rack up a bill that big when paying on a per-program basis, especially if there are fun diversions like personal jet packs and trips to the moon. Have you cut the cable cord yet?

Jen is the Senior Marketing Director for Acorn. When she’s not working or raising her two young cats (Donny and Marie), she can most likely be found playing Words With Friends or reading her Kindle.